The judge reasoned that none of the individual defendants had any affirmative control over their job status.
BAYONNE -- The city of Bayonne is now the sole remaining defendant in a residency requirement lawsuit filed by the former business administrator after a Hudson County judge dismissed the individual defendants.
During a Friday motion for summary judgment in Hudson County Superior Court, Judge Christine Vanek ruled the nine city employees listed alongside the city of Bayonne be dismissed from the complaint filed by Peter Cresci.
The complaint, which Cresci and city resident Michael Morris originally filed in April, called for the termination of all city employees who do not live in Bayonne. Morris has since removed himself from the lawsuit.
The lawsuit listed a number of notable city officials as defendants including city Law Director Jon "Jay" Coffey II and Business Administrator Joe DeMarco.
"We are one Bayonne: those of us who live here, work here and pay taxes," Cresci said during a city council meeting last week. "We should not be manipulated by 'out-of-towners' and people who are here to feather their own nests."
Vanek dismissed Donna M. Russo and Karla Garcia, attorneys for the city who were named as defendants in Cresci's complaint. Both women are protected from the city's residency ordinance by a state statute that allows fireman, police, teachers and other professions such as attorneys and engineers, to live out of town.
Meanwhile, Coffey was dismissed during a chancery division hearing on June 28 by Judge Barry P. Sarkisian based on that statute.
The complaint had since been transferred to the legal division under Vanek.
Vanek also ruled Friday that Drew Niekrasz, the former police chief, was also exempt from the residency ordinance due to protections under the state statute.
READ THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
While the remainder of the defendants were not protected from the residency ordinance, Vanek ruled that none of the individual defendants had any affirmative control over their job status.
While the city remains as a defendant, Vanek's ruling was taken without consideration of a new ordinance passed by the city council on Aug. 16 that cemented and reinforced the requirement for any new employees hired after Oct. 1, 2017, to live in Bayonne. It also grants amnesty to employees hired prior to Oct. 1 (new ordinances take 20 days to take affect, according to city officials).
The lawsuit will continue and the city will now have to submit its answer to the summary judgment by or prior to Sept. 1, according to the court documents.